BibTeX:

@article{IJIRSTV5I11006,
     title={Relative Investigation of Structure of an Intze Tank by Working Stress Method and Limit State Method utilizing IS:3370(1965) and IS: 3370(2009)},
     author={Ruchi Bagrodia, Anubhav Rai, Saurabh Pare and Yogesh Bajpai},
     journal={International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology},
     volume={5},
     number={11},
     pages={8--14},
     year={},
     url={http://www.ijirst.org/articles/IJIRSTV5I11006.pdf},
     publisher={IJIRST (International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology)},
}

Objectives of the study was to 1) To compare the design of an INTZE TANK done by WSM & LSM in reference to IS 3370 – 1965 and IS 3370 – 2009 (new version). 2) To study which method is more economical and proficient. For designing, Intze water tank with top and bottom dome having effective depth 7.5 metres of capacity 5,00,000 liters of water has been designed .For design, M30 grade concrete and Fe-415 grade steel has been used. The graphs are included to show the comparison of outcomes. The following outcome has been observed that a) The cross-sectional area of members remained same for limit state design methods by IS:3370(2009) in limit state of collapse as well in deemed to satisfy criteria. However, the requirement of area of steel increased in IS:3370 (2009) ) in deemed to satisfy design criteria. b) The cross-sectional area of members as well as reinforcement decreased for limit state design method by IS:3370 (2009) in comparison to working stress design method of both IS : 3370 (1965 ) and IS : 3370 (2009) provisions . It was found that the provisions of IS:3370(2009) provides economical and more effective design. However, it was also felt that IS:3370 (2009) should have incorporated direct tensile stress and compressive stress under flexure.

Working Stress Method, Limit State Method, Intze Water tank, Crackwidth, Limit State of Serviceability, Deemed to Satisfy, Ultimate Limit State